Journal Menu

Tools


Publication history

Published article online:
25 Jan 2008

Received on March 6th, 2007.Accepted on October 18th, 2007.

Acta Ophthalmologica

Acta Ophthalmologica

OnlineEarly Articles

To cite this article: Susanne Lindqvist, Torstein Vik, Marit S. Indredavik, Jon Skranes, Ann-Mari Brubakk (2008)
Eye movements and binocular function in low birthweight teenagers
doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01133.x

Abstract

Eye movements and binocular function in low birthweight teenagers

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s and Women’s Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    2Department of Ophthalmology, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
    3Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    4Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    5Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
    6Department of Paediatrics, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Dr Susanne Lindqvist
St Olav’s Hospital
Kvinne-barn-senteret 6 et
Olav Kyrres Gate 11
N-7006 Trondheim
Norway
Tel: + 47 7257 4660
Fax: + 47 7386 7708
Email: susanne.lindqvist@ntnu.no

Abstract.

 

Purpose: To assess eye movements and binocular function in 14-year-olds with very low birthweight (VLBW: birthweight ≤ 1500 g) and 14-year-olds born at term but small for gestational age (SGA: birthweight < 10th percentile) in a population-based study.

Methods: Ophthalmological examinations including measurements of heterophoria/tropia, near point of convergence, accommodative amplitude, stereopsis, nystagmus, saccades and smooth pursuit were performed in 51 adolescents with VLBW, 58 adolescents born SGA and in a control group consisting of 75 subjects of the same age.

Results: Latent or manifest strabismus, poor stereopsis, poor convergence and nystagmus were all more frequent in the VLBW group than in the control group. The VLBW group did not differ from the control group regarding accommodative amplitude or saccades and smooth pursuit. The SGA population did not differ from the control group in the measured variables.

Conclusions: Premature birth with VLBW affects binocular visual functions negatively in adolescence, whereas birth small for date at term does not appear to be a risk factor for impaired eye movements and binocular function.



This Article